Very soon after my
first course in Osteopathy in the Cranial
Field where Dr. Sutherland was still lecturing
once a day I was fired with enthusiasm to
examine newborn babies. Over the next eight
years I examined over fifteen hundred babies
at a local hospital. All were examined within
the first five days of birth for that was the
standard duration of the hospital stay after
delivery in the 1950’s. Many were seen
within 24 hours of birth. Eventually the
results of this study were published revealing
the startling fact that approximately 10% of
the newborn babies had perfect, freely mobile
cranial mechanisms. Another 10% had had such
severe trauma to the head that the diagnosis
was obvious even to the untrained observer as
the baby with the crooked head or
plagiocephaly (the Greek word for a crooked
head). But what about the remaining 80% who
had some strain patterns in the cranial
mechanism? They were relatively easy to
correct in a few minutes.
During the same era A.P. Warthman D.O., was
examining elementary school children in the
Detroit region for a particular school
district. I was impressed that the strain
patterns that he was describing in the
children with academic problems were the same
strain patterns that I was finding in the 80%
of the neonates who did not have severe
visible trauma yet were not in the perfect
group. Would it be possible then to PREVENT
the academic problems in elementary school, by
correcting the strains present in the newborn?
Eventually my hospital closed its maternity
wing, and ultimately the hospital had to close
its doors for the last time.
Now I turned my attention to the question of
whether it was possible to identify something
peculiar to the child with learning
difficulties. The detailed analysis of the
history and physical findings in two hundred
children, one hundred of which were having
learning problems in school revealed that the
stresses of a long or difficult birth were
almost invariably recorded in the histories of
such children. When trauma occurred after
about 3 years of age the child might have
visual perceptual dysfunction which impaired
the ability to follow a line of print smoothly
and efficiently, or the ability to quickly
adapt from distance vision on the board to
near vision on the desk, or the skill to
maintain a clear visual image in all
directions without a “lazy” or
wandering eye, but this child would not have
the difficulty in learning.
At the time of birth all the nerve cells are
present in the brain, but the nerve fibres
progressively acquire a vital myelin sheath as
the nerves develop their function. The child
begins to move, to roll over, to crawl on the
floor, to creep on hands and knees, to stand,
to walk, to talk and do all the other
activities known to small children. This
progressive growth in function of the nervous
system occurs within the precise formation of
the skull. The skull is a mold in which
nervous structure and function develops.
Therefore optimal structural and functional
integrity of the head permits optimal
development and function of the central
nervous system.
The conclusion then, is that if the
osteopathic physician can evaluate, and if
necessary correct the structure of the baby as
soon after birth as possible many of the
problems of childhood may be avoided.
This is PREVENTION at its
best.
For this reason we encourage all mothers to
give their new babies the opportunity for an
osteopathic evaluation and treatment as soon
after birth as possible.
|